LONDON — Is a work on paper a lesser, and perhaps even a smaller, thing? I mean by comparison with a work in oils, a painting on canvas? Works on canvas often look so large and so grandiose, as if they are there to be bowed to, or awestruck by. 

Think of all those history paintings by the French neo-classical painter Jacques-Louis David, for example. Or, say, Ingres’s portrait of Napoleon from 1806, freshly elevated to an imperial throne, tricked out to look like a ridiculous pantomime god. Not a hint of the Corsican runt about him. 

These thoughts spring to mind upon entering Impressionists on Paper: Degas to Toulouse-Lautrec, which occupies three modestly sized galleries at the Royal Academy. How small they all are, most of the works in this first gallery, and somewhat squeezed together too.

And yet smallness was often a part of it because works on paper were frequently the stuff of sketchbooks, not necessarily works of high finish labored over in some studio. They did not strive to be. But modesty of size was also a feature of the Impressionist moment. Once upon a time the pick of the Impressionists in Paris lived at the Jeu de Paume in the Tuileries Gardens, and what first struck any visitor who had grown up with Rubens or the great altarpieces of the Renaissance was that so many off them were, well, little larger than pocket-sized.

Mary Cassatt, “Portrait de Marie-Thérèse Gaillard” (1894), pastel on paper; Private collection (photo © 2007 Christie’s Images Limited)

But that lack of high finish, that lack of calculated and mannered deliberation, drags something else along in its wake, a matter of great importance to those painters. Life as we are living it now. That was what the Impressionists were so keen on, to capture life on the wing, because life — have you not noticed? — always moves along at such a rattling pace, in fact so fast that at times we almost fall off. A great painting on canvas, on the other hand, often slows life right down, and gently cajoles us into associating it with the much longer time of eternity and mythology. What an effective wheeze for puffing up the importance of mere humanity!

So in the first gallery we find Manet capturing people squeezed into a lurching cabriolet along the Rue Mosnier in the rain. The date is 1878. Boulevard St. Michel or Fifth Avenue? It’s much the same story really, getting somewhere fast in headlong pursuit of wine and oysters.

But there is a change, a quite significant one, by the time we reach the final gallery. The best is kept to the end, as with many a well-turned plot: Degas and his dancers, rendered large, and in pastel — this use of pastel is highly significant in terms color and its intensity. Can an Impressionist work on paper match the richness and color range achieved with oils or acrylic on canvas? Yes, if you are Edgar Degas. 

Vincent van Gogh, “The Fortifications of Paris with Houses” (1887), graphite, black chalk, watercolor, and gouache on paper (photo © The Whitworth, The University of Manchester; photography Michael Pollard)
Georges Seurat, “Seated Youth, Study for ‘Bathers at Asnières’” (1883), black conté crayon on laid paper; National Galleries of Scotland
Edgar Degas, “Dancer Yawning (Dancer Stretching)” (1873), essence (diluted oil paint) on prepared green paperboard; Private collection (photo Alex Fox, Roy Fox Fine Art Photography)
Odilon Redon, “Ophelia Among the Flowers” (c. 1905–8), pastel; The National Gallery, London (photo © The National Gallery, London)
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, “At the Circus: The Encore” (1899), black and colored chalks on paper; Collection of David Lachenmann
Federico Zandomeneghi, “Study of a Woman from Behind” (1890–97), pastel on cardboard; Galleria D’Arte Moderna, Milan (photo © Comune di Milano, all rights reserved)
Claude Monet, “Cliffs at Etretat: The Needle Rock and Porte d’Aval” (c. 1885), pastel on wove paper; National Galleries of Scotland
Edgar Degas, “Dancer Seen from Behind” (c. 1873), essence (diluted oil paint) on prepared pink paper; collection of David Lachenmann

Impressionists on Paper: Degas to Toulouse-Lautrec continues at the Royal Academy of Art (6 Burlington Gardens, London, England) through March 10. The exhibition was curated by Ann Dumas.

Michael Glover is a Sheffield-born, Cambridge-educated, London-based poet and art critic, and poetry editor of The Tablet. He has written regularly for the Independent, the Times, the Financial Times,...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *